Tags

Sixteenth-Amendment

Claims Partially Supported

W2 Wages, Cost Basis, and the Asymmetry the Tax Code Won't Explain

The claim that wages aren't 'income' has been rejected by every federal court that's heard it. But buried inside the losing argument is a genuine observation: labor is the only factor of production denied a cost basis. That asymmetry is real, indefensible, and worth understanding on its own terms.

14 min read May 6, 2026
Doctrine Unresolved

What "Income" Means — and Why a Century of Case Law Hasn't Settled It

The Sixteenth Amendment uses 'income' without defining it. Eisner v. Macomber tried. Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass tried again. Neither fully succeeded. The resulting ambiguity is not a conspiracy — it's a real doctrinal gap with real consequences.

18 min read May 4, 2026
History Foreclosed

The Sixteenth Amendment was never properly ratified

Bill Benson's research found drafting and procedural irregularities in the state ratifications of the Sixteenth Amendment. Courts have uniformly rejected the legal conclusion he draws from them.

7 min read Apr 28, 2026
Doctrine Supported

Brushaber held the income tax is an excise, not a direct tax

Brushaber v. Union Pacific (1916) characterized the income tax as an excise. This characterization is correct, underappreciated, and load-bearing for understanding what the Sixteenth Amendment did and didn't do.

5 min read Apr 26, 2026
History Partially Supported

Pollock was never overruled — only circumvented by the Sixteenth Amendment

Pollock v. Farmers' Loan (1895) remains technically good law. The Sixteenth Amendment routed around it without overruling it. This is doctrinally true and partially load-bearing.

8 min read Apr 24, 2026
Questions Unresolved

Whether Glenshaw Glass expanded "income" beyond the original constitutional meaning

A live academic question: did the 1955 Glenshaw Glass formulation broaden 'income' past what the Sixteenth Amendment originally authorized?

6 min read Apr 20, 2026

The Law That Never Was

Argues the Sixteenth Amendment was never properly ratified by the requisite states.

Jan 1, 0001

Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

Held the post-Sixteenth Amendment income tax is properly characterized as an excise, not a direct tax requiring apportionment.

Jan 1, 0001

Apportionment

The constitutional requirement that direct taxes be allocated among the states by population. The mechanism the Sixteenth Amendment removed for income taxation.

Jan 1, 0001

Income

What 'income' means — and doesn't mean — in the Internal Revenue Code, the Sixteenth Amendment, and a century of Supreme Court precedent.

Jan 1, 0001